![\"\"](\"https:\/\/staging-wmplo.xyz\/mark-c-divi5\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/images-1-300x158.jpeg\")
If American companies were given a report card today for their progress in improving employee\nengagement over the past four years, most would receive a failing grade.<\/p>\n
If American companies were given a report card today for their progress in improving employee
\nengagement over the past four years, most would receive a failing grade.<\/p>\n
Surely, many leaders will scowl at the notion that they could be seen as failing at a time when elevating engagement scores has been one of their organization\u2019s highest expressed priorities. But since the Summer of 2013 when Gallup announced workplace engagement had reached rock bottom, the truth is that scores aren\u2019t meaningfully better.<\/p>\n
“How is it possible that the needle hasn\u2019t substantially moved in 4 years?”<\/p>\n
“Since our company\u2019s internal numbers look good, aren\u2019t we being lumped in with all the low performers?”<\/p>\n
“How can a committed organization jump-start their engagement performance?”<\/p>\n
I recently reconnected with Gallup\u2019s long-time research director, Dr. Jim Harter, to discuss these inevitable questions. And if you hope to earn an \u201cA\u201d in engagement when the next grading period comes, the following insights will be helpful.<\/p>\n
There Has Been Some Improvement<\/p>\n
At the start of October, 34% of American workers were fully engaged in their jobs. That\u2019s an increase from 30% in 2013, which means an additional 7.2 million workers are now willing to put in discretionary effort in order to help their bosses and organizations succeed.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/staging-wmplo.xyz\/mark-c-divi5\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/0-300x114.jpeg\")
\u201cI recognize this is a positive change,\u201d says Harter, \u201cbut we\u2019re not satisfied. Too many workplaces remain indifferent to committing to supporting employee\u2019s basic needs and to leveraging that for higher performance.<\/p>\n
Compared to the best practice organizations in the US \u2013 ones that have now reached 70% or higher engagement \u2013 I\u2019m pretty critical of overall leadership.\u201d<\/p>\n
Take Your Thumb Off The Scale<\/p>\n
Ninety-four percent of American workers say they completed an employee survey in the past year or so \u2013 a clear indication most organizations are measuring engagement, and continue to see a direct connection between high scores and elevated organizational performance.<\/p>\n
But according to Harter, most companies are using survey tools that produce a highly inflated read on how engaged employees actually are. And once leaders are persuaded they already have high engagement, they\u2019re generally influenced to retreat from the initiatives that support it.<\/p>\n
\u201cMost engagement surveys use a 1-to-5 rating scale,\u201d Harter told me, \u201cbut it\u2019s now a common practice for companies to combine all the 4\u2019s and 5\u2019s into what\u2019s known as \u2018Percent Favorable.\u2019 And this methodology is a huge mistake because it incorrectly assumes a score of 4 is just as good as a 5.\u201d<\/p>\n
Consider the standard engagement question, \u201cI know what\u2019s expected of me at work.\u201d If an employee gives a 5 rating to that, they\u2019re inherently saying they strongly agree, and have extreme clarity on their job duties. But if they rate that same question a 4, they\u2019re backing off quite a lot.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe truth is 4\u2019s and 5\u2019s play out very differently in the workplace,\u201d Harter told me, \u201cand no leader should be content with ‘favorability’ when only strong agreement leads to the highest levels of performance. A 4 is closer to ‘contentment’ whereas a 5 is full ‘commitment.'”<\/p>\n
Ironically, no company would ever accept squishiness in their revenue or profitability reporting, so the time has come for leaders to demand their engagement metrics are made no less rigorous. Soft measures provide zero benefit, and the truth is everyone in the entire organization knows the results aren\u2019t real.<\/p>\n
How Can We Remedy This?<\/p>\n
There are many drivers of engagement, of course, but I asked Harter what he would implement first were he charged with turning around a single organization\u2019s performance. He prioritized these three things:<\/p>\n
1. Adopt A New Model For Selecting Managers<\/p>\n
Last month, a study by the American Psychological Association\u2019s Center For Organizational Excellence found that people are at least two times more likely to be satisfied in their jobs when they work for a supportive boss.<\/p>\n
Gallup\u2019s research not only reconfirms this, it shows an inclination to care about the success, growth and well-being of other people has become a great differentiator of high-performing managers.<\/p>\n
Picking the right people for managerial roles is the essential first step if company leaders are truly committed to creating compelling workplaces, and workers today are demanding bosses who act like caring coaches. \u201cWith more people working remotely, and with teams being asked to work more collaboratively, this heart trait will only become more essential,\u201d Harter says. \u201cCompanies can and must hire for this, but so far we see very few making the shift.\u201d<\/p>\n
2. Teach Essential 21st Century Management Skills<\/p>\n
One of the huge gaps in business today is that managers are rarely held responsible for the engagement of their people, or for turnover within their teams. Too few companies report this critical data down to the individual manager level, or weed out leaders who exploit employees in the pursuit of performance. All of this must change.<\/p>\n
Gallup also believes the best workplace managers are highly skilled in setting performance expectations, coaching employees to greater levels of competency, tracking performance, and holding people accountable for results. \u201cBusinesses must invest in training that teaches managers to master these essential skills,\u201d Harter told me. \u201cLeaders must always remember, productivity and engagement go hand-in-hand.\u201d<\/p>\n
3. Rip Off The Band-Aid<\/p>\n
Four years without meaningful improvement is enough, Gallup believes, and the time for talking about engagement is over. \u201cWe need organizations to stop plodding along thinking a once-per-year survey event will magically change things,\u201d Harter asserted. \u201cThere\u2019s tremendous upward pressure for leaders to get this right, and only a change of approach will produce a different outcome.\u201d<\/p>\n
It should be encouraging to all workplace leaders to know engagement scores are very changeable. Low results aren\u2019t static, and plenty of organizations have turned things around. But because setting small goals and seeking modest improvements over time clearly hasn\u2019t worked, Gallup is urging leaders to rip off the band aid.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe only way companies will get to where they need to be,\u201d Harter concludes, \u201cis to take courageous action. Put the right managers in place. Put the right metrics in place. Put the right practices in place. Fully commit to building a culture you can be proud of, and that will improve the performance of your organization.\u201d<\/p>\n
Carpe diem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
If American companies were given a report card today for their progress in improving employee engagement over the past four years, most would receive a failing grade. Surely, many leaders will scowl at the notion that they could be seen as failing at a time when elevating engagement scores has been one of their organization\u2019s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,13,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3272","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lifeaffairs","category-heartleadershipinpractice","category-leadership"],"yoast_head":"\n